Monday, June 2, 2008

Response to Beyond Technology

The article reflects on the high impact technology is having on education. It addresses and stresses the believed outcomes that lie ahead for the 21st century learner. The article address the changes technology has had in the work place in the last few years and the impact it has made for workers making working from common place. It then continues with a variety of models that “should be” for example; students “should be” expected to create knowledge products to publish, students, “should be” expected to communicate in a global market, students, “should be” able to design their own learning and be responsible for that learning. Although I agree with the fundamental basis for this article I do believe a few factors have been over looked. First, we forget we are teaching children and although they are eager and quick to learn they all develop at a different pace and all are not developmentally ready to take responsibility for their learning at the same time. I believe that there still is a vast gap in the technology that is available in school varying equality even within a school district. That gap grows even greater within the family. My family knows and practices the responsibility of providing the tools to make education the best it can be. While my sister cannot afford a computer for her home and does not wish to have one because she believes her children get enough of computers at school and she does at work. I work with teachers that feel just the opposite the kids are on the computers at home and do not need to be on it at school. It is this backwards thinking that will make the information highway come to a crawl in regards to education. The private sector (lawmakers, businesses, idealist) want to see computers in every dark empty corner of our country. The reality is there is not enough funding to make the education playing field equal even if 100 Bill Gates and Steve Jobs dumped all their money into the system. Until the classroom is transformed from a more traditional look and takes on a different look (telecommunicating to school) I am afraid it will be difficult to instill a since of progress equal to that in the privet business sector.

3 comments:

Unknown said...

I totally agree that it is frustrating to even think about what education (including technology, of course) SHOULD be and what it IS. I suppose that is our challenge as teachers to squeeze it all in - in a smart and meaningful way! :)

Melodie B. said...

It is hard to meet the expecttions of lawmakers and business professionals concerning what they think education should be, considering they have not been in classroom since they themselves were children. It is also tough when these individuals have certain expecttions but do not provide teachers and educational professionals with ample resources to meet them. I would love to create a daily classroom environment where children are creating, making meaning, collaborating, communicating and such but with limited resources and the constant pressure of AIMS, there are times when I just have to resort to more ancient teaching methds to produce results. Sometimes the reality is sad but true!

jmitteness said...

Kathleen,

I hear what you are saying about inequalities in access to computers and technology. For more information you may be interested in checking out these sites:
http://www.digitaldivide.org/dd/index.html
http://edcommunity.apple.com/ali/story.php?itemID=544
http://www.digitaldivide.net/
http://www.bridgethedigitaldivide.com/